Table 2.

(Study 5) Stimuli in the high-affiliation (AFF-), low-control (CTL+) and high-control groups (CTL−), with mean ratings of affiliation and control obtained before and after acoustic manipulation (pitch shifting in AFF-, time shifting in CTL+ and CTL−). Abbreviations: CON: conciliatory; CAR: caring; DOM: domineering; s.t.: semitone; s: second.

				Before		Manipulation		After
Extracts	Musician A	Musician B	Attitude	Affiliation (M)	Control (M)	Start–End (Dur.)	Transf.	Affiliation (M)	Control (M)
AFF- GROUP
1_1	Piano	Saxophone	CON	6.7	3.7	1:00–1:14 (0:14)	A + 1 s.t.	6.6	4.5
2_9	Piano	Saxophone	CAR	7.0	5.3	2:11–2:53 (0:42)	A + 1 s.t.	6.7	5.6
5_5	Viola	Violin	CAR	5.5	5.3	0:17–0:48 (0:31)	A + 1 s.t.	4.6	4.6
5_9	Viola	Violin	CON	5.0	4.4	0:53–1:23 (0:30)	A + 2 s.t.	4.5	5.3
5_10	Violin	Viola	CAR	5.7	4.5	0:38–0:58 (0:20)	A + 1 s.t.	5.3	3.9
CTL+ GROUP
3_7	Bassoon	Saxophone	CAR	5.3	3.9	0:11–0:32 (0:21)	B + 2s.	4.7	4.8
7_3	Guitar	Clarinet	CAR	6.8	4.0	0:29–0:46 (0:18)	B + 1.4s.	4.1	4.8
8_2	Saxophone	Dbl bass	CAR	6.0	3.3	1:43–2:25 (0:42)	B + 5s.	5.9	4.0
9_10	Viola	Double bass	CAR	6.0	3.4	2:02–2:35 (0:33)	B + 3s.	6.0	3.8
10_5	Flute	Viola	CAR	5.2	4.2	0:04–0:25 (0:21)	B + 2s.	5.4	4.5
CTL− GROUP
1_7	Piano	Saxophone	DOM	2.8	6.3	0:35–0:44 (0:09)	A + 1s.	2.5	5.5
1_7	Piano	Saxophone	DOM	2.7	6.0	0:56–1:11 (0:15)	A + 3s.	2.5	6.5
3_6	Saxophone	Bassoon	DOM	3.4	6.0	0:18–0:33 (0:15)	A + 0.8s.	3.3	5.7
3_9	Bassoon	Saxophone	DOM	4.2	6.8	0:44–1:12 (0:28)	A + 3s.	3.2	6.8
4_8	Saxophone	Piano	DOM	5.5	4.3	0:22–0:45 (0:23)	A + 2.5s.	5.5	3.8

Mean affiliation and control ratings which changed in the predicted direction after manipulation are indicated in bold.