Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 Jan 30;57(2):162–169.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.12.065
PRIMARY PHARMACY LOCATION
Located within Study Region Not Located within Study Region All Primary Pharmacies
Number of Pharmacies, % 34 (65.0%) 18 (35.0%) 52 (100.0%)
Utilization Rate, N (%) 117(81%) 27 (19%) 144(100.0%)
Pharmacy Type
 Chain 22 (64.1%) 14 (77.8%) 36 (69.2%)
 Independent 6 (17.7%) 1 (5.6%) 7 (13.5%)
 Clinic/CHC 6 (17.6%) 3 (16.7%) 9 (17.3%)
Community Racial/Ethnic Composition*
 Predominately Black 25 (83.3%) 5 (27.8%) 30 (62.5%)
 Predominately Hispanic 1 (3.3%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (2.1%)
 Predominately White 2 (6.7%) 11 (61.1%) 13 (27.1%)
 Diverse/Integrated 2 (6.7%) 2 (11.1%) 4 (8.3%)

Notes: Sample of 144 respondents excludes 9 respondents reporting the use of mail-order pharmacies. Differences in primary pharmacy utilization rates between pharmacy locations (located on Chicago’s South Side vs. not located on Chicago’s South Side) were tested using Pearson Chi Square Statistic;

*

Statistically significant difference at p<0.05