Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 23;127(600):445–494. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12282

Table C5.

Choice Models with Alternative QOF Points‐Based Quality Measures

Co‐efficient Co‐efficient Co‐efficient Co‐efficient Co‐efficient
QOF 2006/7 total points 0.00222***
(0.00016)
QOF 2009/10 total points 0.000690***
(0.00019)
QOF av four years 2006/7–2009/10 0.00315***
(0.00023)
QOF 2006/7 clinical points 0.00327*** 0.00228***
(0.00028) (0.00059)
QOF 2006/7 organisational points 0.00268***
(0.00047)
QOF 2006/7 patient experience points −0.000342
(0.00064)
QOF 2006/7 additional services points 0.0192***
(0.00396)
QOF 2006/7 holistic care points −0.00275
(0.00617)
Distance −0.7512*** −0.7523*** −0.7519*** −0.7507*** −0.7508***
(0.0163) (0.0162) (0.0162) (0.0163) (0.0162)
BIC 11,597,725 11,687,958 11,664,682 11,607,006 11,594,414
McFadden R2 0.3991 0.3974 0.3985 0.3986 0.3993
N practices 973 981 971 973 973
N patients 3,350,561 3,358,351 3,358,351 3,350,561 3,350,561
MRS 0.0030*** 0.0009*** 0.0042*** 0.0044***
(0.0002) (0.0002) (0.0003) (0.0004)

Conditional logit models of choice of practice. All models have the same covariates, distance specification and choice set definitions as in Table 2. Distance coefficient is β^d+2β^d2d¯+3β^d3d2¯ where d¯ and d2¯ are computed as the mean of the LSOA centroid to practice distance and squared distance for the whole sample. MRS is the coefficient on quality divided by the distance coefficient. Number of LSOAs is 2,870 in all models. Standard errors clustered at LSOA level are in parentheses. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.