Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 23;127(600):445–494. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12282

Table C8.

Choice Models with Alternative Distance Specifications

Linear Quadratic Cubic Quartic Quintic Log distance
QOF 2006/7 points 0.00231*** 0.00221*** 0.00222*** 0.00222*** 0.00222*** 0.00216***
(0.00016) (0.00016) (0.00016) (0.00016) (0.00016) (0.00018)
Distance km −0.963*** −1.424*** −1.606*** −1.430*** −1.410***
(0.01189) (0.01804) (0.04044) (0.07144) (0.12245)
Distance squared 0.0683*** 0.126*** 0.0318 0.0166
(0.00226) (0.01189) (0.03442) (0.08575)
Distance cubed −0.00447*** 0.0125* 0.0171
(0.00091) (0.00607) (0.02466)
Distance power four −0.000955** −−0.00154
(0.00035) (0.00303)
Distance power five 0.0000257
(0.00013)
Ln distance −1.851***
(0.02036)
Distance −0.9633*** −0.8161*** −0.7512*** −0.7406*** −0.7371*** −0.4163***
(0.0119) (0.0092) (0.0163) (0.0170) (0.0249) (0.0046)
MRS 0.0024*** 0.0027*** 0.0030*** 0.0030*** 0.0030*** 0.0052***
(0.0002) (0.0002) (0.0002) (0.0002) (0.0002) (0.0004)
BIC 11,779,955 11,603,666 11,597,725 11,596,060 11,596,070 12,246,338
McFadden R2 0.3897 0.3988 0.3991 0.3992 0.3992 0.3655

Conditional logit models of choice of practice. All models have the same covariates as in Table 2. The distance coefficient is the derivative of the utility function evaluated using the estimated coefficients and the mean of the powers of LSOA to practice distance for the whole sample. Standard errors clustered at LSOA level are in parentheses. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.