Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 31;7(52):85785–85797. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11768

Table 3. Diagnostic performance of preliminary models to predict malignant IPMN pathology in the study cohort.

Modela Variables included AUC
(95% CI)
Sensitivity Specificity Positive predictive value Negative
predictive value
Demographic and clinical data Age at diagnosis, gender, presence of symptoms 0.73
(0.56-0.89)
0.83 0.55 0.63 0.79
Standard imaging data High risk stigmata 0.84
(0.72-0.96)
0.83 0.85 0.83 0.85
Genomic data 5-miRNA genomic classifier (MGC) 0.83
(0.69-0.97)
0.78 0.80 0.78 0.80
Standard imaging + genomic data High risk stigmata,
MGC
0.95
(0.88-1.00)
0.94 0.90 0.89 0.95
Standard imaging data Worrisome features 0.54
(0.38-0.69)
0.72 0.35 0.50 0.58
Standard imaging + genomic data Worrisome features,
MGC
0.83
(0.69-0.97)
0.83 0.80 0.79 0.84
Radiomic data Radiomic PC1 classifier 0.77
(0.61-0.93)
0.83 0.74 0.75 0.82
Radiomic + genomic data Radiomic PC1 classifier +
MGC
0.92
(0.83-1.00)
0.83 0.89 0.88 0.85
Standard imaging+ radiomic+ genomic data Worrisome features, Radiomic PC1 classifier +
MGC
0.93
(0.85-1.00)
0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89

a Full models include 20 benign and 18 malignant IPMNs.