. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Diabetes Complications. 2017 Jan 20;31(4):669–674. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.01.004

Table 3.

Adjusted association between psychological trauma and HbA1c, overall and stratified by level of social support.

	N	n	No trauma Mean (95% CI)	Trauma, no symptoms Mean (95% CI)	Trauma, with ≥ 1 symptom(s) Mean (95% CI)	p-value
	HbA1c in 12 months post psychological trauma assessment
Overall	240	81	7.5 (7.0–8.0)	7.0 (6.3–7.6)	8.4 (7.7–9.1)	0.02
Low social support	132	45	7.3 (6.9–7.7)	7.1 (5.8–8.3)	9.0 (8.1–9.8)	<0.01
High social support	108	36	7.8 (7.0–8.6)	7.0 (6.3–7.7)	7.2 (6.2–8.2)	0.32
	HbA1c in 6 months post psychological trauma assessment
Overall	122	71	7.2 (6.7–7.7)	6.8 (6.2–7.4)	8.4 (7.6–9.2)	<0.01
Low social support	65	37	6.9 (6.6–7.3)	6.8 (5.6–7.9)	8.8 (7.9–9.7)	<0.01
High social support	57	34	7.4 (6.6–8.2)	6.9 (6.2–7.6)	7.4 (6.1–8.8)	0.50

Adjusted for age, education, number of doctor visits in past 6 months, duration of T2DM at time of HbA1c test; Hb = hemoglobin; N = number of observations; n = number of participants; CI = confidence interval.