Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Oct 18;100(3):509–517. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.017

Table 4.

Estimated changes from baseline and differences between the SMI and LDE groups for caregiver outcomes at follow-up 1 and 2.

Measurement and study time point Follow-up #1 change from baseline
Follow-up #2 change from baseline
SMI LDE Mean Difference Between Groups (95% CI) P-value SMI LDE Mean Difference Between Groups (95% CI) p-value
PUS-FM, total score −0.9 −1.2 0.3 (−3.7, 4.3) 0.888 −2.0 −0.6 −1.5 (−4.6, 1.7) 0.369
PUS-FM, lack of clarity subscale −0.04 −0.7 0.6 (−1.3, 2.5) 0.515 −0.3 0.02 −0.3 (−2.0, 1.4) 0.734
PUS-FM, unpredictability subscale 0.1 0.2 −0.2 (−1.3, 1.0) 0.774 −0.2 −0.3 0.1 (−0.9, 1.1) 0.856
PUS-FM, lack of information subscale 0.6 0.5 0.1 (−0.8, 1.0) 0.893 0.2 0.3 −0.1 (−0.9, 0.7) 0.732
PUS-FM, ambiguity subscale −1.5 −1.3 −0.2 (−2.7, 2.3) 0.891 −1.9 −0.6 −1.3 (−3.7, 1.2) 0.316
SCS, cognitive reframing subscale −0.2 −1.6 1.4 (−3.3, 6.0) 0.560 −0.1 −0.9 0.8 (−3.1, 4.7) 0.694
SCS, problem solving subscale −0.4 −2.1 1.8 (−2.7, 6.2) 0.434 −0.4 −1.4 1.0 (−2.6, 4.6) 0.578
Self-efficacy 0.1 −2.0 2.2 (−4.8, 9.1) 0.543 1.7 −3.1 4.8 (−1.4, 11.0) 0.125
CRA, impact on schedule subscale −0.2 −0.2 −0.04 (−0.4, 0.3) 0.816 −0.2 −0.1 −0.004 (−0.3, 0.3) 0.983
CRA, caregiver esteem subscale −0.04 −0.1 0.02 (−0.2, 0.2) 0.820 0.03 −0.02 0.05 (−0.1, 0.2) 0.584
CRA, lack of family support subscale −0.2 −0.2 0.003 (−0.3, 0.3) 0.983 −0.1 −0.1 0.04 (−0.2, 0.3) 0.774
CRA, impact on health subscale −0.1 −0.04 −0.01 (−0.2, 0.2) 0.927 −0.04 0.002 −0.04 (−0.2, 0.2) 0.668
CRA, impact on finances subscale −0.1 −0.1 −0.03 (−0.4, 0.3) 0.878 0.1 0.05 0.03 (−0.3, 0.3) 0.867

Note. LDE = Liver Disease Education, SMI = Self-management Intervention, CI = Confidence interval, PUS-FM = Perception of Uncertainty Scale Family Member, SCS = Self Control Schedule, CRA = Caregiver Reaction Assessment. Estimates are based on a general linear model with an unstructured covariance matrix and adjusted for study site (Duke vs. non-Duke). Results are combined across multiply imputed datasets.

Improvement from baseline to respective follow-up assessments is reflected in negative values for PUS-FM (total score and subscales), and positive values for SCS subscales, self-efficacy, and CRA subscales.