Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 15;8:359. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00359

Table 5.

Regression analyses.

Relation SOA Overall model (Block 2) R2 Change from Block 1 Predictor Beta t p
Compositional 50 R2 = 0.040, F(6, 1578) = 11.06, p < 0.001 ΔR2 = 0.009, F = 5.19, p = 0.001 Prime CD −0.034 −1.22 0.223
Prime Ortho-N −0.038 −1.32 0.186
ELP Target zRT 0.148 5.20 <0.001
Co-occurrence −0.055 −1.47 0.141
Integ. Rating −0.069 −2.08 <0.05
Visual Exp. Rating 0.024 0.77 0.441
300 R2 = 0.066, F(6, 1149) = 13.51, p < 0.001 ΔR2 = 0.039, F = 15.98, p < 0.001 Prime CD 0.013 0.43 0.670
Prime Ortho-N −0.053 −1.60 0.109
ELP Target zRT .126 3.80 <0.001
Co-occurrence −0.102 −2.37 <0.05
Integ. Rating −0.039 −1.00 0.316
Visual Exp. Rating −0.104 −2.89 <0.01
800 R2 = 0.032, F(6, 1378) = 7.68, p < 0.001 ΔR2 = 0.008, F = 3.62, p = 0.01 Prime CD 0.037 1.27 0.200
Prime Ortho-N −0.013 −0.43 0.660
ELP Target zRT 0.151 4.91 <0.001
Co-occurrence 0.007 0.19 0.850
Integ. Rating −0.083 −2.38 <0.05
Visual Exp. Rating −0.026 −0.78 0.436
1600 R2 = 0.035, F(6, 1206) = 6.73, p < 0.001 ΔR2 = 0.005, F = 2.16, p = 0.09 Prime CD −0.003 −0.09 0.928
Prime Ortho-N −0.012 −0.38 0.708
ELP Target zRT 0.169 5.16 <0.001
Co-occurrence −0.011 −0.27 0.788
Integ. Rating −0.058 −1.53 0.127
Visual Exp. Rating −0.018 −0.52 0.605
Locative 50 R2 = 0.064, F(6, 1539) = 17.49, p < 0.001 ΔR2 = 0.013, F = 7.18, p < 0.001 Prime CD −0.023 −0.86 0.391
Prime Ortho-N 0.064 2.34 <0.05
ELP Target zRT 0.157 5.20 <0.001
Co-occurrence −0.090 −3.10 <0.01
Integ. Rating −0.085 −2.64 <0.01
Visual Exp. Rating 0.031 0.90 0.367
300 R2 = 0.050, F(6, 1124) = 9.87, p < 0.001 ΔR2 = 0.009, F = 3.75, p = 0.01 Prime CD −0.046 −1.42 0.155
Prime Ortho-N 0.090 2.80 <0.01
ELP Target zRT 0.114 3.22 <0.001
Co-occurrence −0.077 −2.26 <0.05
Integ. Rating −0.070 −1.82 0.069
Visual Exp. Rating 0.026 0.65 0.518
800 R2 = 0.032, F(6, 1343) = 7.29, p < 0.001 ΔR2 = 0.018, F = 8.18, p < 0.001 Prime CD 0.058 1.96 0.050
Prime Ortho-N 0.024 0.82 0.410
ELP Target zRT 0.074 2.27 <0.05
Co-occurrence −0.107 −3.40 0.001