Table 3.
Symposium outcomes*
| N (%) | |
|---|---|
| Knowledge of DII science | |
| Increased knowledge about DII science (n = 72) | 58 (80.5) |
| Increased knowledge of DII activities in the Los Angeles Region (n = 73) | 64 (87.7) |
| Exposure to new ideas and concepts (n = 73) | 61 (83.5) |
| Increased interest in conducting or participating in DII science (n = 72) | 53 (73.6) |
| Symposium was valuable to attendee's work (n = 73) | 56 (76.7) |
| Agenda relevant to attendee's needs/interest (n = 72) | 55 (76.4) |
| Plans to change or augment practice/research based upon symposium topics (n = 71) | 33 (46.5) |
| Likely to participate in future DII activities | |
| Webinars on featured DII research (n = 60) | 37 (61.7) |
| Webinars on DII methods (n = 63) | 42 (66.7) |
| Working groups or collaborative on DII research and/or methods (n = 65) | 39 (60.1) |
| Webinars on DII funding opportunities (n = 63) | 34 (57.7) |
| Webinars on other DII opportunities (n = 62) | 34 (54.9) |
| Listserv on DII funding and/or other DII opportunities (n = 63) | 48 (76.2) |
| Symposia or workshops on DII topics (n = 64) | 46 (71.9) |
*Response rate differed between questions.