Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 14;14:42. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0304-7

Table 3.

Determinants of PPIUD insertion

VARIABLES PPIUD insertion PPIUD insertion PPIUD insertion
PPIUD Positive Quality Indicators
 Could mention at least one risk? 0.133*** 0.0473***
(0.0526) (0.0203)
 Client informed about alternatives? 0.215*** 0.674
(0.0893) (0.300)
 Client given opportunity to ask questions? 1.321* 1.220
(0.189) (0.180)
 Given PPIUD information leaflet? 8.367*** 5.633***
(1.064) (0.768)
PPIUD Negative Quality Indicators
 Could not mention at least one benefit? 1.58e-07*** 7.92e-08***
(3.52e-08) (2.36e-08)
 Dissatisfaction with PPIUD counselling? 0.0242*** 0.0485***
(0.0245) (0.0487)
Counselling Location
 Home 0.160*** 0.184***
(0.0271) (0.0278)
 Field Clinic 0.173*** 0.152***
(0.0231) (0.0179)
 Hospital Clinic 1.931*** 0.975
(0.200) (0.0942)
 Hospital Ward 4.372*** 2.139***
(0.441) (0.219)
Observations 12971 12316 12295

*** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1

Notes: The unit of observation is a woman. Incidence rate ratios are presented with robust standard errors in the parentheses below. Results are from a modified Poisson regression that includes age, parity, and hospital controls. Regressions are also weighted by the inverse of the proportion sampled in order to correct for the fact that enumerators failed to collect information for around 14.3% of the total number of deliveries across the four hospitals. Counselling received is whether counselling was received at this location type or not. Information on PPIUD is whether the respondent received the information on this element of counselling or not