Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 14;14:42. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0304-7

Table 4.

Determinants of PPIUD Counselling Quality Indicators by location

Quality indicators Leaflet Risks Alternatives Questions No benefits Dissatisfaction
Counselling location:
 Home 0.868*** 1.034 0.904*** 0.923** 1.353 2.698***
(0.0338) (0.0279) (0.0224) (0.0288) (0.402) (0.603)
 Field Clinic 0.946** 0.784*** 0.973*** 0.923*** 0.454*** 1.499***
(0.0247) (0.00781) (0.00688) (0.00718) (0.139) (0.178)
 Hospital Clinic 2.535*** 1.128*** 1.003 1.068*** 0.0405*** 0.998
(0.0665) (0.0102) (0.00654) (0.00712) (0.0152) (0.104)
 Hospital Ward 2.093*** 1.130*** 1.045*** 1.052*** 0.100*** 0.382***
(0.0427) (0.00653) (0.00475) (0.00561) (0.0327) (0.0503)
Observations 12930 12963 12962 12929 12963 12371

*** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1

Notes: The unit of observation is whether respondent was informed of binary indicators of quality: PPIUD benefits, risks, alternatives, opportunity to ask questions, receipt of PPIUD leaflet, and satisfaction. Incidence rate ratios are presented with robust standard errors in the parentheses below. Results are from a modified Poisson regression that includes age, parity, and hospital controls. Regressions are also weighted by the inverse of the proportion sampled in order to correct for the fact that enumerators failed to collect information for around 14.3% of the total number of deliveries across the four hospitals