Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 30;9(2):74–88. doi: 10.1111/cts.12390

Table 3.

Comparison of phase 0/microdosing with traditional phase I approaches

Phase 0/Microdosing (eIND) Traditional Phase I (IND)
Therapeutic intent None Possible
Study of systemic tolerability None Yes
Proof of Mechanism Possible (e.g., PET receptor binding and displacement) Possible
Preclinical Package Limited, variable; depends on extent of exposure to the test article and experimental goals Full requirements
in vitro models Full requirement Full requirements
toxicology Limited, variable Full requirements
genotoxicology None or limited Full requirements
GMP Flexible, depending on available preclinical information and route of administration (e.g., sterility ensured for IV route) Full requirements
Regulatory Review 30‐day 30‐day
Usual Duration of Program 4‐12 months 12‐24 months
Cost of Program $ 0.5‐0.75 M $ 1.5‐2.5 M
Studies
size (typical) 4‐10 participants 6‐30 participants
duration (per participant) 1‐14 days* 6‐60 days*
number of study sites Single Single/Multiple
maximal dose <MTD MTD
exposure Limited (see Table 1) Multiple doses allowed
population Healthy volunteers or patientsVulnerable populations Usually health volunteers (unless toxicity risk is high, e.g., in oncology trials)

*on average, could be longer with longer half‐life drugs; MTD, maximum tolerated dose.