Table 3.
Comparison of phase 0/microdosing with traditional phase I approaches
Phase 0/Microdosing (eIND) | Traditional Phase I (IND) | |
---|---|---|
Therapeutic intent | None | Possible |
Study of systemic tolerability | None | Yes |
Proof of Mechanism | Possible (e.g., PET receptor binding and displacement) | Possible |
Preclinical Package | Limited, variable; depends on extent of exposure to the test article and experimental goals | Full requirements |
in vitro models | Full requirement | Full requirements |
toxicology | Limited, variable | Full requirements |
genotoxicology | None or limited | Full requirements |
GMP | Flexible, depending on available preclinical information and route of administration (e.g., sterility ensured for IV route) | Full requirements |
Regulatory Review | 30‐day | 30‐day |
Usual Duration of Program | 4‐12 months | 12‐24 months |
Cost of Program | $ 0.5‐0.75 M | $ 1.5‐2.5 M |
Studies | ||
size (typical) | 4‐10 participants | 6‐30 participants |
duration (per participant) | 1‐14 days* | 6‐60 days* |
number of study sites | Single | Single/Multiple |
maximal dose | <MTD | MTD |
exposure | Limited (see Table 1) | Multiple doses allowed |
population | Healthy volunteers or patientsVulnerable populations | Usually health volunteers (unless toxicity risk is high, e.g., in oncology trials) |
*on average, could be longer with longer half‐life drugs; MTD, maximum tolerated dose.