Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 6;33(6):799–806. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw321

Table 4.

The effect of the size of the friends set on the quality of the correction. The elapsed time is the runtime of LoRDEC*+LoRMA

Friends 5 7 10 15 20
Coverage 75×
Size (%) 59.173 59.164 59.146 59.109 59.085
Aligned (%) 98.894 98.983 99.099 99.192 99.226
Error rate (%) 0.169 0.156 0.148 0.131 0.128
Gen. cov. (%) 90.918 90.907 90.900 90.888 90.884
Elapsed time (h) 1.13 1.22 1.53 1.88 2.27
Memory (GB) 14.522 14.518 14.522 14.515 14.525
Disk (GB) 1.076 1.076 1.076 1.076 1.076

Coverage 100×
Size (%) 65.759 65.738 65.723 65.670 65.607
Aligned (%) 98.091 98.317 98.491 98.556 98.620
Error rate(%) 0.152 0.140 0.134 0.114 0.110
Gen. cov. (%) 99.404 99.403 99.405 99.403 99.405
Elapsed time (h) 2.53 3.32 4.32 5.80 7.08
Memory (GB) 14.720 14.720 14.712 14.723 14.720
Disk (GB) 1.417 1.416 1.417 1.416 1.416

Coverage 175×
Size (%) 66.933 66.906 66.905 66.852 66.816
Aligned (%) 98.927 98.973 99.153 99.011 99.104
Error rate(%) 0.222 0.194 0.191 0.140 0.133
Gen. cov. (%) 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100.000
Elapsed time (h) 6.77 8.35 10.62 14.07 17.22
Memory (GB) 16.009 16.016 16.003 16.002 16.006
Disk (GB) 2.361 2.361 2.362 2.362 2.362