Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 6;33(6):799–806. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw321

Table 6.

Comparison of both hybrid and self-correction tools on PacBio data

Tool Size Aligned Error rate Genome coverage Elapsed time Memory peak Disk peak
(%) (%) (%) (%) (h) (GB) (GB)
E. coli Original 100.000 71.108 16.9126 100.000
LoRDEC 65.672 98.944 0.1143 99.820 0.96 0.368 1.570
proovread 61.590 98.603 0.2789 99.728 28.65 9.522 7.174
PBcR (with Illumina) 52.103 98.507 0.0682 98.769 15.13 17.429 160.154
Jabba 2.873 99.945 0.0003 99.745 0.02 0.168 0.606
PBcR (only PacBio) 51.068 86.023 0.6905 100.000 1.68 22.00 16.070
LoRDEC*+LoRMA 66.223 99.318 0.2572 100.000 10.40 16.984 2.824
Yeast Original 100.000 89.929 16.8442 99.974
LoRDEC 75.522 97.337 0.9987 99.833 3.17 0.451 2.776
proovread 0.306 97.156 0.8004 20.346 11.18 4.764 7.162
PBcR (with Illumina) 57.337 98.100 0.3342 99.652 22.05 20.085 157.726
Jabba 24.979 99.484 0.1279 99.900 0.17 1.031 0.993
PBcR (only PacBio) 60.065 95.822 2.1018 99.907 4.42 9.571 24.610
LoRDEC*+LoRMA 71.987 98.088 0.3644 99.375 21.08 17.968 4.852

Results for tools utilizing also Illumina data are shown on a grey background