Skip to main content
. 2004 Dec;70(12):6951–6956. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.12.6951-6956.2004

TABLE 1.

COMSTAT analysis of E. coli ATCC 33456 biofilm structurea

Medium or compound No. of samples Total biomass (μm3/μm2) Maximum thickness (μm) Substratum coverage (%) Roughness coefficient Avg diffusion distance (μm) Surface-to-biovolume ratio (μm2/μm3)
LB medium 10 1.5 ± 0.9b 46.2 ± 5.7 34 ± 19 1.7 ± 0.2 0.02 ± 0.02 4.1 ± 0.7
Cinnamaldehyde 20 1.6 ± 0.7f 18.3 ± 1.8d,f 16 ± 5d,f 1.5 ± 0.2d,e 0.05 ± 0.03c,f 2.0 ± 0.2d,f
Eugenol 19 4.1 ± 2.8c 22.2 ± 6.1d 57 ± 19c 1.1 ± 0.5d 0.18 ± 0.18c 2.8 ± 1.0d
Citronellol 10 4.8 ± 2.0c 28.5 ± 10.0d 52 ± 18c 0.9 ± 0.3d 0.12 ± 0.09c 3.5 ± 0.5
a

Biofilms were grown for 18 h in flow cells. Essential oil components were added at concentrations that resulted in 60% inhibition of the planktonic growth rate.

b

All values are means ± standard deviations.

c

Significantly greater (P < 0.05) than the corresponding value for the LB medium control.

d

Significantly less (P < 0.05) than the corresponding value for the LB medium control.

e

Significantly greater (P < 0.05) than the corresponding value for citronellol.

f

Significantlly less (P < 0.05) than the corresponding value for citronellol.