TABLE 2.
Genogroup | Clustera | Representative virus | Tm (°C) | Slope | R2 | Inhibitorsb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | 1 | Norwalk | 81.84 | −0.344 | 0.999 | No |
2 | Southampton | 83.00 | −0.447 | 0.997 | No | |
3 | Desert Shield | 82.39 | −0.357 | 0.984 | Yes | |
4 | Chiba | 83.79 | −0.803 | 0.974 | No | |
5 | Musgrove | 83.17 | −0.388 | 0.981 | No | |
II | 1 | Hawaii | 83.82 | −0.390 | 0.970 | Yes |
2 | Snow Mountain | 82.67 | −0.428 | 0.991 | No | |
3 | Toronto | 81.18 | −0.459 | 1.000 | No | |
4 | Lordsdale | 83.96 | −0.400 | 0.968 | Yes | |
5 | Hillingdon | 83.34 | −0.364 | 0.998 | Yes | |
6 | Seacroft | 84.90 | −0.669 | 1.000 | Yes | |
7 | Leeds | 84.90 | −0.590 | 1.000 | Yes | |
8 | Amsterdam | 82.81 | −0.337 | 0.995 | No |
Genetic clusters are based on criteria described by Ando et al. (1).
A “yes” indicates that the real-time RT-PCR reaction was partially inhibited by the use of 1 μl of stool extract in the real-time RT-PCR reaction mix.