. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 15.

Published in final edited form as: Proc IEEE Int Conf Data Min. 2017 Feb 2;2016:360–369. doi: 10.1109/ICDM.2016.0047

Table IV.

Average rank of the calibration methods on the benchmark datasets using LR as the base classifier. Marker */⊛ indicates whether ENIR is statistically superior/inferior to the compared method (using an improved Friedman test followed by Holm's step-down procedure at a 0.05 significance level).

	IsoRegC	BBQ	ENIR
AUC	1.963	2.225	1.813
ACC	1.675	2.663*	1.663
RMSE	1.925*	2.625*	1.450
ECE	2.125	1.975	1.900
MCE	2.475*	1.750	1.775