Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 15;12(3):e0173861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173861

Table 2. Odds ratio analysis with odds ratios after adjustment for covariates (including age and gender) between the MetS and 16 SNPs in five selective circadian clock genes, which have nominal evidence of association (P < 0.01).

Additive model Dominant model Recessive model
Gene SNP Alleles OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P
ARNTL rs10832020 C T 1.23 1.05–1.45 0.0114 1.06 0.87–1.28 0.5586 1.54 1.13–2.09 0.0065
GSK3B rs2199503 T C 0.83 0.70–0.99 0.0331 1.04 0.85–1.26 0.7245 0.64 0.47–0.89 0.0070
PER3 rs10746473 G A 1.20 1.04–1.38 0.0116 1.46 1.17–1.83 0.0010 1.11 0.88–1.40 0.3691
rs2797685 C T 1.17 1.01–1.35 0.0314 1.41 1.11–1.78 0.0047 1.07 0.85–1.33 0.5731
rs1689904 C T 1.16 1.01–1.34 0.0352 1.39 1.10–1.76 0.0061 1.07 0.86–1.33 0.5618
rs1773138 T C 0.85 0.74–0.99 0.0304 0.94 0.76–1.17 0.5902 0.71 0.56–0.90 0.0043
RORA rs17237367 A G 0.82 0.68–0.98 0.0263 0.75 0.62–0.91 0.0036 0.74 0.53–1.05 0.0926
rs58469372 A G 0.82 0.71–0.95 0.0092 0.85 0.70–1.04 0.1113 0.71 0.54–0.93 0.0129
rs12591650 A G 1.20 1.04–1.38 0.0109 1.39 1.11–1.75 0.0049 1.16 0.93–1.44 0.1948
rs12594188 C T 1.21 1.01–1.45 0.0389 1.33 1.10–1.61 0.0035 1.32 0.92–1.88 0.1272
rs17270446 G C 0.97 0.70–1.35 0.8455 1.37 1.12–1.68 0.0021 0.84 0.44–1.63 0.6109
rs11630062 C T 0.92 0.80–1.05 0.2267 0.76 0.62–0.93 0.0082 1.02 0.80–1.30 0.8834
rs8029848 G A 1.28 1.05–1.56 0.0127 1.41 1.17–1.71 0.0004 1.43 0.98–2.09 0.0629
rs8034880 G A 1.29 1.05–1.58 0.0150 1.44 1.19–1.74 0.0002 1.44 0.97–2.14 0.0711
rs72752802 C A 0.81 0.69–0.94 0.0053 0.87 0.72–1.06 0.1716 0.67 0.50–0.88 0.0045
RORB rs972902 A G 0.72 0.55–0.96 0.0227 0.76 0.62–0.93 0.0087 0.57 0.33–0.98 0.0426

CI = confidence interval, MetS = metabolic syndrome, OR = odds ratio. Analysis was obtained after adjustment for covariates including age and gender. P values of < 0.01 are shown in bold.