Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 15;12(3):e0173832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173832

Table 2. Percentages (95% CIs) of subjects with abnormal spatial point pattern analysis parameters >97.5th percentile and abnormal CEAI and CNFL *<2.5th percentile of the control group.

Control (n = 47) Diabetes (n = 86) P value
ESD (%) 8.5 (3.0–18.4) 18.6 (12.0–26.9) 0.136
MINN (%) 2.1 (0.1–9.7) 19.3 (12.5–27.8) 0.005
MINNSD (%) 4.3 (0.8–12.8) 21.7 (14.5–30.4) 0.01
MENN (%) 4.3 (0.8–12.8) 8.4 (4.0–15.3) 0.487
MENNSD (%) 6.4 (1.8–15.7) 12.0 (6.7–19.6) 0.374
VCA (%) 4.3 (0.8–12.8) 14.5 (8.6–22.4) 0.084
VCASD (%) 6.4 (1.8–15.7) 21.7 (14.5–30.4) 0.026
CEAI (%)* 4.3 (0.8–12.8) 11.9 (6.6–19.4) 0.210
MADL (%) 4.3 (0.8–12.8) 23.5 (16.2–32.3)§ 0.003
MADPC (%) 4.3 (0.8–12.8) 16.5 (10.2–24.5)§ 0.051
CNFL (%)*|| 4.3 (0.8–12.8) 18.6 (12.0–26.9) 0.019

||Previously published in ref. [14];

missing values:

§n = 1;

n = 2;

n = 3.

MINN: minimum nearest neighbor distances between branching points, MENN: mean nearest neighbor distances between branching points, MINNSD: standard deviation of minimum nearest neighbor distances between branching points, MENNSD: standard deviation of mean nearest neighbor distances between branching points, CEAI: Clark and Evans aggregation index, ESD: mean empty space distance for a branching point pattern, VCA: Voronoi cell area, VCASD: standard deviation of Voronoi cell area, MADL: maximum absolute deviation from complete spatial randomness based on L-functions, MADPC: maximum absolute deviation from complete spatial randomness based on pair-correlation functions, CSR: complete spatial randomness, CNFL: corneal nerve fiber length