Table 7. Results for regression on cued versus non-cued content mazes.
| Log-odds | S.E.s | χ2 | P(χ2) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | −0.852 | |||
| Group: | 7.22 | .027 | ||
| ASD | −0.194 | 0.07 | ||
| SLI | 0.032 | 0.10 | ||
| TD | 0.162 | 0.10 | ||
| VIQ | 0.062 | 0.06 | 1.24 | .265 |
| ADOS Activity: | 45.65 | <.001 | ||
| Play | −0.071 | 0.04 | ||
| Description Of A Picture | 0.061 | 0.03 | ||
| Telling A Story From A Book | −0.164 | 0.04 | ||
| Conversation | 0.174 | 0.03 |
Mixed effects logistic regression on relative frequencies of the use of cued versus non-cued content mazes; predictors which favor cued content mazes have positive log-odds and predictors which favor non-cued content mazes have negative log-odds. VIQ = Verbal IQ.