Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 30;8(1):1023–1030. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13714

Table 2. Meta-analysis of PLR and OS, DFS.

Factors No. of studies No. of patients HR (95% CI) p Effects model Heterogeneity
I2 (%) Ph
Overall for OS 6 3,679 1.55 (1.07–2.25) 0.022 Random 67.3 0.009
Region
Asian 4 2,449 1.26 (0.85–1.85) 0.251 Random 52.2 0.099
Non-Asian 2 1,230 2.36 (1.58–3.52) < 0.001 Fixed 0 0.427
Treatment
Systemic treatment 3 2,665 1.78 (1.06–2.99) 0.03 Random 76.6 0.014
Chemotherapy 1 177 2.82 (1.09–7.26) 0.032
Radiotherapy 1 350 0.7 (0.37–1.31) 0.264
Surgery 1 487 1.42 (0.76–2.68) 0.273
Sample size (n)
> 400 4 3,152 1.67 (1.13–2.47) 0.01 Random 64.8 0.036
< 400 2 527 1.34 (0.34–5.23) 0.674 Random 82.7 0.016
Overall for DFS 5 1,869 1.73 (1.3–2.3) < 0.001 Fixed 40.5 0.151
Region
Asian 4 1,076 1.72 (1.06–2.8) 0.027 Random 53.6 0.091
Non-Asian 1 793 2.03 (1.03–4.01) 0.042
Treatment
Chemotherapy 2 239 2.6 (1.47–4.61) 0.001 Fixed 0 0.708
Radiotherapy 1 350 0.9 (0.49–1.66) 0.736
Surgery 1 487 1.8 (1.12–2.89) 0.016
Systemic treatment 1 793 2.03 (1.03–4.01) 0.042
Sample size (n)
> 400 2 1,280 1.87 (1.27–2.76) 0.002 Fixed 0 0.773
< 400 3 589 1.73 (0.81–3.72) 0.158 Random 68.4 0.042

OS = overall survival; DFS = disease-free survival.