Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 22;8(1):1871–1883. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12202

Table 2. Pooled hypermethylation rates of P16INK4a in LSIL, HSIL and CC specimens.

Comparison Studies (N) Specimens (N) Heterogeneity Model a Methylation rates (%)
I2(%) PQ-test
LSIL
Total 14 388 47 0.025 R 21.4 (15.0-29.7)
Asian 6 86 21 0.278 F 24.6 (16.1-35.5)
Caucasian 5 193 67 0.016 R 21.5 (9.8-41.0)
Others 3 109 59 0.088 R 13.8 (5.1-31.9)
HSIL
Total 17 636 82 < 0.001 R 30.9 (21.9-41.7)
Asian 7 231 81 < 0.001 R 31.9 (18.2-49.7)
Caucasian 7 286 76 < 0.001 R 27.2 (16.6-41.2)
Others 3 119 88 < 0.001 R 34.5 (9.9-71.6)
CC
Total 24 1439 88 < 0.001 R 35.0 (27.6-43.3)
Asian 14 941 87 < 0.001 R 33.7 (25.5-43.3)
Caucasian 6 363 85 0.006 R 38.2 (27.1-50.6)
Others 3 135 96 < 0.001 R 39.7 (26.7-54.3)
a

When significant heterogeneity was found (I2≥ 50% or PQ-test ≤ 0.1), the random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird method) was used to pool the results; otherwise, the fixed-effects model (Mantel-Haenszel method) was applied.

Abbreviations: N, number; LSIL, low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesion; HSIL, high-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesion; CC, cervical cancer; R, random-effects model.