Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 12;8(5):7452–7463. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13918

Table 3. Comparison of accuracy for MSI-H detection.

mSINGS
Metric COAD/READ UCEC COAD/READ + UCEC STAD
Sensitivity 84.2% 53.1% 66.7% 92.0%
Specificity 100.0% 100.0% 100% 100.0%
Accuracy 92.1% 76.8% 83.4% 96.0%
MSISensor
Metric COAD/READ UCEC COAD/READ + UCEC STAD
Sensitivity 92.1% 98.0% 95.4% 98.0%
Specificity 92.1% 98.0% 95.5% 100.0%
Accuracy 92.1% 98.0% 95.4% 99.0%
MANTIS
Metric COAD/READ UCEC COAD/READ + UCEC STAD
Sensitivity 100.0% 91.8% 95.4% 100.0%
Specificity 97.4% 100.0% 98.9% 100.0%
Accuracy 98.7% 96.0% 97.1% 100.0%

The performance of mSINGS, MSISensor, and MANTIS over 275 COAD/READ, UCEC, and STAD sample pairs.