Table 3.
Multiple logistic regression model results of the contribution of RE-AIM attribute perceptions to determining program adoption decision
| Variables | B | S.E. | Wald | Sig. | OR | 95 % CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||||
| Perception that the program | |||||||
| Was effective in community settings | −2.95 | 1.22 | 5.806 | 0.016* | 0.052 | 0.005 | 0.576 |
| Was easier to deliver than other physical activity programs | 5.20 | 2.11 | 6.066 | 0.014* | 181.552 | 2.892 | 11,395.978 |
| Was easier to deliver than other extension food or nutrition programs | 1.85 | 1.30 | 2.010 | 0.156 | 6.369 | 0.493 | 82.340 |
| Fits the mission of Cooperative Extension | −4.09 | 2.17 | 3.530 | 0.060 | 0.017 | 0.000 | 1.193 |
| Will be sustained in Cooperative Extension for longer than 1 year without special funding | 1.40 | 0.70 | 3.965 | 0.046* | 4.077 | 1.022 | 16.256 |
| Will receive good public relations opportunities and visibility for me and extension | −2.11 | 1.31 | 2.574 | 0.109 | 0.120 | 0.009 | 1.599 |
| Perceptions that the HE did not have the expertise that is needed to deliver the program | −2.38 | 1.12 | 4.499 | 0.034* | 0.092 | 0.010 | 0.834 |
*p < 0.05; χ 2 (7) = 25.754; p < 0.001