Table 4.
Proportion of reported items according to RE-AIM dimension
| RE-AIM indicator | Reporting proportion |
|---|---|
| Reach | |
| Method to identify target population | 50 % |
| Inclusion criteria | 40 % |
| Exclusion criteria | 40 % |
| Participation rate | 40 % |
| Characteristics of participants and non-participants | 0 % |
| Total reach indicators | 34 % |
| Efficacy/effectiveness | |
| Primary outcome results | 100 % |
| Present at follow-up/intent to treat | 70 % |
| Percent attrition | 90 % |
| Quality of life/measure of unintended outcomes | 30 % |
| Total efficacy/effectiveness indicators | 73 % |
| Adoption | |
| Description of intervention location | 60 % |
| Description of staff who delivered intervention | 60 % |
| Method to identify target delivery agent | 40 % |
| Level of Expertise of delivery agent | 60 % |
| Inclusion/exclusion criteria of settings/interventionists | 30 % |
| Setting or delivery agent participation rate | 40 % |
| Total adoption indicators | 48 % |
| Implementation | |
| Intervention number of contacts/duration | 70 % |
| Extent protocol delivered as intended | 20 % |
| Measure of cost | 0 % |
| Total implementation indicators | 30 % |
| Maintenance | |
| Individual outcomes assessment | 40 % |
| Information on continued delivery | 50 % |
| Information on the degree of institutionalization | 40 % |
| Total maintenance indicators | 43 % |