Table 2.
Integrated backscatter used to assess myocardial fibrosis in patients with ESRD: IB, integrated backscatter; HD, hemodialysis; CKD, chronic kidney disease; INHD, incentre nocturnal hemodialysis.
| Study | Patient characteristics | Results | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Losi et al. [61] | Case-control study with 25 ESRD patients on HD | Mean (±standard deviation) IB was greater in patients with ESRD than in controls (45.2 ± 8.6 dB versus 36 ± 6.1 dB; p = 0.025). A significant determinant of diastolic dysfunction as measured by echocardiography was mean IB with odds ratio of 1.212 (p = 0.04) | Small study as very selective patient criteria for inclusion |
|
| |||
| Salvetti et al. [60] | Case-control study with matched 25 HD patients, 25 patients with moderate-to-severe CKD, 10 patients with essential hypertension with normal renal function | Mean reflectivity of IB was progressively increased from 48% in patients with essential hypertension to 56% in patients with CKD to 62% in HD patients (p < 0.01) The increase in IB reflectivity indicates possible early increase in LV collagen deposition, beginning well before the development of ESRD |
No histological data from biopsies to confirm fibrosis |
|
| |||
| Jin et al. [62] | Non-RCT with 58 ESRD patients on conventional HD matched with 32 INHD patients | At 12 months, mean (±standard deviation) cIB decreased significantly from −20.2 ± 3.7 dB to −28.1 ± 4.0 dB (p < 0.01) in INHD patients and cyclic variations in IB increased in INHD patients; INHD improved echocardiogram markers for myocardial fibrosis | Nonrandomised, small study with short follow-up time. No histological data from biopsies available to confirm fibrosis |