Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 7;7:43528. doi: 10.1038/srep43528

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The mean P300 peak amplitude (A) and latency (B) in Go trials (left) and No-go trials (right) averaged across all electrodes. Post-hoc testing demonstrated that the amplitude of Go-P300 was significantly reduced during heat stress (HS) and face/head cooling (FHC), but recovered during whole body cooling (WBC), whereas the amplitude of No-go-P300 was significantly reduced during HS, FHC, and WBC. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 from Rest. Values are the mean ± standard deviation.