Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 15;7:44652. doi: 10.1038/srep44652

Figure 2. OS and RFS comparison between PLT and SLT group both before and after PSM.

Figure 2

(A) and (B) OS and RFS both have an inferior prone in SLT group than in PLT group, with significance in RFS (LogRank p < 0.05) but not in OS (LogRank p > 0.05). (C) and (D) After PSM, the RFS seem significantly worse in SLT group. In a 1:1 match of 23 pairs, the 1 yr, 3 yr and 5 yr OS rate was 77.89%, 74.18% and 68.47% respectively in PLT group, significantly better than 62.34%, 34.29% and 34.29% in SLT group (LogRank P < 0.05). The OS phenomenon was in the same trend with an almost significance, in a 23 to 23 PSM, with 86.96%, 52.17% and 17.39% respectively in P group and 56.52%, 30.43% and 4.35% in SLT group (LogRank P > 0.05).