Table 1.
Impact of certification standards for shared decision-making tools on the review process
Selected standards for the certification of shared decision-making tools (IPDAS) | Impact on the review process |
---|---|
The tool describes the options available for the index decision (level 1). | ▸ Several interventions need to be reviewed to design a single shared decision-making tool. |
The tool describes the positive and negative features of each option in equal detail (levels 1 and 2). | ▸ Less robust sources of information need to be used when there is a lack of evidence or detail (e.g., harms of an intervention). |
The tool allows users to compare the negative and positive features of available options (level 3). | ▸ All probabilities need to be transformed into absolute risks with a common denominator, to allow the comparison of benefits and harms, as well as the various options. |
The tool enables the comparison of outcome probabilities using the same denominator (level 3). |