Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 7;38(1):20–26. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw260

Table 2.

Controlled trials and selected observational data sets reporting sinus rhythm rates after catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation

Patients Intervention Control Sinus rhythm outcome
Ablation Control
Controlled trials
 Wazni47 70 (paroxysmal and persistent) CA AAD + CV 87%a 46%a
 Oral48 146 PVI + Amiodarone Amiodarone + CV 74%a 58%a
 Stabile49 137 (paroxysmal or persistent) CA: PVI + mitral line + CTI AAD 56% 10%
 Forleo50 70 (41 persistent) CA AAD + CV 80%a 43%a
 Jones51 52 CA Rate control 88%a n.a.
 Mont10 146 CA AAD + CV 70% 44%
 Verma43 589 PVI PVI + lines, PVI + CFAE 59% 46%; 49%
 Dong52 146 CA + lines (fix) CA (stepwise) 67% 60%
Observational data sets
 Hunter (multi centre)53 586 (persistent) CA (1.8 mean procedures, mainly PVI) n.a. 60%a n.a.
 Scherr (single centre)54 150 CA (AF termination outcome) n.a. 65% n.a.
 Schreiber (single centre)55 549 CA (stepwise approach) n.a. 56% n.a.
 Haissaguerre56 103 CA (driver domains) 65%a n.a.

AAD, antiarrhythmic drugs; CA, catheter ablation; CV, cardioversion; PVI, pulmonary vein isolation.

aNumbers in italic indicate success rates without intensive ECG monitoring.