Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Place. 2017 Feb 4;44:61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.01.005

Table 5.

Adjusted Racial/Ethnic Differences in Ideal Cardiovascular Health Summary Measures

Health Factors Health Behaviors Overall Ideal CVH

OR [95% C.I.] OR [95% C.I.] OR [95% C.I.]
Black-white

 Unadjustedc 0.613 [0.505– 0.744] 0.362 [0.292– 0.448] 0.324 [0.216– 0.487]
 Fixed Effectc,d 0.691 [0.509– 0.939] 0.333 [0.234– 0.473] 0.419 [0.221– 0.797]
 Random Effectc,e 0.622 [0.504– 0.766] 0.398 [0.313– 0.505] 0.349 [0.223– 0.548]
 Hybrid Fixed Effectc,f 0.689 [0.516– 0.919] 0.387 [0.282– 0.533] 0.456 [0.256– 0.812]
Largest % changeg 20.2% 5.6% 19.5%
Hispanic-white
 Unadjustedc 0.680 [0.536– 0.862] 0.441 [0.334– 0.581] 0.403 [0.245– 0.664]
 Fixed Effectc,d 0.770 [0.552– 1.075] 0.435 [0.284– 0.668] 0.422 [0.205– 0.870]
 Random Effectc,e 0.681 [0.535– 0.868] 0.477 [0.358– 0.636] 0.430 [0.257– 0.718]
 Hybrid Fixed Effectc,f 0.765 [0.561– 1.044] 0.527 [0.362– 0.769] 0.452 [0.236– 0.867]
Largest % change 28.1% 15.4% 8.2%
P-valueb
 Unadjustedc <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 Fixed Effectc,d 0.035 <0.001 0.003
 Random Effectc,e <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 Hybrid Fixed Effectc,f 0.021 <0.001 0.004

P-value<0.05 for beta coefficient for black-white or Hispanic-white comparison and CVH indicator

a

Outcome compares ideal vs. intermediate/poor CVH

b

p-value for overall association between race/ethnicity and CVH indicator

c

All models include the following covariates: study site, gender, race/ethnicity, age, education, income

d

Fixed effects model includes: neighborhood tract identifier

e

Random effects model includes: neighborhood SES, neighborhood physical environment, neighborhood social environment

f

Hybrid fixed effects model includes: neighborhood SES, neighborhood physical environment, neighborhood social environment, neighborhood proportion black, neighborhood proportion Hispanic