Table 3. Reporting of qualitative methods with patients and carers.
Allard 2014 [16] | Arnold 2008 [24] | Potter 2013 [19] | Saketkoo 2014a [32] | Swigris 2005 [22] | Stamm 2009 [21] | Sanderson 2010a [30] | Tierney 2013 [34] | Tierney 2015 [35] | Turk 2008 [37] | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Health area | Neurodisability | Fibromyalgia | Breast cancer | Interstitial lung disease | Interstitial lung disease | Osteoarthritis | Rheumatoid arthritis | Cleft palate, otitis media | Cleft palate, otitis media | Chronic pain |
Theoretical framework | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R |
Sampling | ||||||||||
Approach | Purposive | Purposive | Purposive | N/R# | Purposive | Purposive | Purposive | Purposive | Purposive | N/R# |
No. approached | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R |
No. taking part | 107 | 48 | 31 | 45 | 20 | 56 | 23 | 43 | 22 | 31 |
Age | Yes | Yes | Yes | YesΨ | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Gender | Yes | Yes | Yes | YesΨ | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Ethnicity | Yes | Yes | N/R | YesΨ | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | Yes |
Socio economic status | Yes | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | N/R | Yes |
Clinically relevant info | Yes | Yes | Yes | YesΨ | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Data collection | ||||||||||
Focus groups | Yes | Yes | n/a | Yes | Yes | Yes | n/a | n/a | n/a | Yes |
Interviews | Yes | n/a | Yes | n/a | Yes | n/a | Yes | Yes | Yes | n/a |
Data analysis | ||||||||||
A priori categories applied | Yes (plus emergent themes) | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Thematic/content analysis* | Yes | n/a | n/a | Yes | Yes | Yes | n/a | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Grounded theory** | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No |
Framework approach*** | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Data saturation mentioned | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No |
Triangulation | ||||||||||
Multiple coders/perspectives | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Data collection methods (both focus groups and interviews) | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No |
Reflexivity | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
N/R = not reported, n/a = not applicable,
# = Some indication of types of participant included but not the sampling approach used.
Ψ Details reported in Saketkoo 2014b.
* Paper describes a generic thematic / content approach
** Paper describes analysis informed by Grounded Theory approaches, rather than an explicit Grounded Theory methodological framework
*** Paper refers to the use of framework as part of the analytical process