Table 2. Models explaining fix success rate (FSR) of snapshot and traditional micro-GPS receivers at 37 stationary test sites.
| Micro-GPS | Model | K | AICc | ΔAICc | Wt | LL | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | |||||||
| Burrow + Vegetation Closure–Burrow X Vegetation Closure* | 6 | 3106.63 | 0.00 | 1.00 | -1547.3 | 1 | |
| Traditional | |||||||
| - Burrow* - Surrounding (6 m) Canopy | 5 | 641.41 | 0.00 | 0.26 | -315.7 | 1 | |
| - Burrow* - Shrub Height | 4 | 641.49 | 0.08 | 0.25 | -315.8 | 2 | |
| - Burrow* | 5 | 641.52 | 0.10 | 0.25 | -316.8 | 3 | |
| - Burrow* - Vegetation Closure | 5 | 642.97 | 1.55 | 0.12 | -316.5 | 4 | |
| - Burrow* - Surrounding (12 m) Canopy | 5 | 643.15 | 1.73 | 0.11 | -316.6 | 5 | |
K, the number of parameters estimated; ΔAICc, the change in AICc; Wt, model weight; LL, log-likelihood.
*Significant at the 85% confidence level
(+) positive influence of covariate and (-) negative influence of covariate on FSR.