Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 16;12(3):e0174045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174045

Fig 4. Projected changes (%) in E0 by 2050 across the different E0 formulations.

Fig 4

Percent change in mean MJJAS E0 from Penman-Monteith (top row), Hargreaves-Samani (center), and Priestley-Taylor (bottom) formulations for GFDL-ESM2M (left) and CanESM2 (right) by 2050 (2036–2065) relative to the historical (1976–2005) period. Grid cells where the change is not statistically significant (i.e., p > 0.05) are masked out in white.