Table 1. Summary of the diagnostic results of the included studies.
study | Year | Country | Simple size | Simple type | Test methods | TP (n) | FP (n) | FN (n) | TN (n) | Cut-off Values (pmol/L) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases | Controls | a | b | c | d | |||||||
Hellstrom | 2010 | USA | 79 | 56 | Urine | / | ELISA | 70 | 5 | 9 | 51 | NR |
Macuks | 2012 | Riga | 23 | 55 | Urine | / | ELISA | 18 | 14 | 5 | 41 | 1300 |
Jian HQ | 2012 | China | 30 | 78 | Urine | Serum | ELISA | 28 | 1 | 2 | 77 | 71.519 |
Yuan ZF | 2012 | China | 50 | 78 | Urine | Serum | ELISA | 40 | 7 | 10 | 71 | 6.51 |
Zhang YJ | 2013 | China | 98 | 57 | Urine | Serum | ELISA | 84 | 7 | 14 | 50 | 18.74 |
Wang Y | 2014 | China | 41 | 62 | Urine | Serum | ELISA | 28 | 4 | 13 | 58 | 6.51 |
Liao | 2015 | USA | 92 | 187 | Urine | / | ELISA | 47 | 10 | 45 | 177 | Specificity of 95% |
Abbreviations: ELASA, Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay; TP, true positive rate; FP, false-positive rate; FN, false-negative rate; TN, true negative rate; NR, not reported;