Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 17;8(3):4994–5002. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14007

Table 2. Patients’ responses to EGFR-TKI re-challenge.

Response Sequence pattern Total (n = 66)
G to G (n = 13) E to E (n = 12) G to E (n = 33) E to G (n = 8)
CR (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
PR (%) 2 (15.4) 1 (8.3) 0 (0) 1 (12.5) 4 (6.1)
SD (%) 5 (38.5) 5 (41.7) 7 (21.2) 5 (62.5) 22 (33.3)
PD (%) 6 (46.1) 6 (50.0) 26 (78.8) 2 (25.0) 40 (66.6)
DCR 53.8% 50.0% 21.2% 75.0% 39.4%
ORR 15.4% 8.3% 0.0% 12.5% 6.1%
Median PFS (95% CI) 3.2 (2.0–4.4) 2.7 (0.5–4.9) 1.2 (0.8–1.6) 2.9 (2.6–3.2) 2.0 (1.3–2.7)
Median OS (95% CI) 5.1 (2.2–8.0) 8.8 (4.1–13.5) 4.1 (2.4–5.8) 9.6 (4.7–14.5) 6.8 (4.7–8.9)

CR, complete response. PR, partial response. SD, stable disease. PD, progression disease. DCR, disease control rate. ORR, objective response rate. PFS, progression-free survival. OS, overall survival. CI, confidence interval G, gefitinib. E, erlotinib.