Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 23;8(3):5256–5267. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14128

Table 1. The correlation between expression characteristic of CRKL and ABCG2 in GC specimens and GC clinicopathologic features.

Clinicopathologic parameters CRKL expression (n=e52) P * ABCG2 expression (n=72) P *
Low (n=15) High(n=37) Low (n=27) High(n=45)
Age (years)
 ≤60 5 (33%) 16 (43%) 0.509 14 (51%) 21 (47%) 0.808
 >60 10 (67%) 21 (57%) 13 (49%) 24 (53%)
Gender
 Male 12 (80%) 25 (68%) 0.37 15 (56%) 28 (62%) 0.625
 Female 3 (20%) 12 (32%) 12 (44%) 17 (38%)
Diameter (cm)
 ≤5 12 (80%) 18 (49%) 0.038 19 (70%) 18 (40%) 0.016
 >5 3 (20%) 19 (51%) 8 (30%) 27 (60%)
Location
 Distal third 10 (67%) 23 (62%) 0.76 14 (52%) 31 (69%) 0.209
 Middle or proximal third 5 (33%) 14 (38%) 13 (48%) 14 (31%)
Histologic Classification
 Poorly differerntial 7 (47%) 22 (59%) 0.792 11 (41%) 23 (51%) 0.501
 Middle/well differerntial 4 (25%) 6 (16%) 9 (37%) 8 (18%)
 Signer ring cell cancer 3 (20%) 6 (16%) 3 (11%) 7 (16%)
 Mucinous asenocainoma 1 (8%) 3 (9%) 4 (11%) 7 (14%)
Location invasion
 T1, T2 6 (40%) 2 (5%) 0.002 15 (56%) 13 (29%) 0.045
 T3, T4 9 (60%) 35 (95%) 12 (44%) 32 (71%)
Lymph node metastasis
 No 7 (47%) 4 (11%) 0.004 14 (52%) 10 (22%) 0.019
 Yes 8 (53%) 33 (89%) 13 (48%) 35 (78%)
TNM stage
 I, II 7 (47%) 2 (5%) 0.001 15 (56%) 12 (27%) 0.023
 III, IV 8 (53%) 35 (95%) 12 (44%) 33 (73%)

CRKL and ABCG2 expression level associated with clinicopathologic features in GC patients, including age, gender, tumor size, tumor location, histologic classification, local invasion, lymph node metastasis and TNM stage. Statistically significance was assessed by Fisher's exact text.