Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 6;8(8):13400–13412. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14541

Table 3. Summary of the association of NLR and clinopathological parameters in cervical cancer.

Category n Model OR (95% CI) Z P Heterogeneity
I2 Ph
Histologic grade (poor vs. well or moderate) 5 (916) Random 1.317 (0.968–.792) 1.75 0.080 54.0% 0.069
Tumor size (≥ 4 cm vs. < 4 cm) 6 (1151) Random 1.780 (1.090–2.908) 2.30 0.021 66.3% 0.011
Clinical stage (III or IV vs.I or II) 4 (1437) Fixed 2.443 (1.730–3.451) 5.07 < 0.001 0.0% 0.768
Lymph node metastasis (positvie vs. negative) 6 (998) Fixed 2.380 (1.775–3.190) 5.79 < 0.001 0.0% 0.515
Histologic type (SCC vs. non SCC) 6 (2173) Fixed 1.007 (0.792–1.281) 0.06 0.955 0.0% 0.421

P denotes P value for statistical significance based on Z test; Ph denotes P value for heterogeneity based on Q test. OR odds ratio; CI confidence interval; SCC squamous cell carcinoma.