Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 14;112(5):984–996. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.01.021

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Modeling the ATPase cycle for β-cardiac myosin. (A) The best fit of ATPase rate versus actin concentration, [A], for HC WT β-S1. Data in blue are the predicted ATPase rates based on the published Vmax and Km values, and data in red indicate the best fit of the model in Fig. 1 to the data. The constants used and derived in the fitting are listed in Table 1. The state occupancies for each of the intermediates in the cycle are given in a pie chart, color coded to match the intermediates in Fig. 1. These are shown for three actin concentrations (blue diamonds), [A] = Km, 3Km, and 20Km, and at 3Km under load (see text). (B) The convergence of the equilibrium constants, KA, KH, and KAH, and reverse rate constants, kPi, and, kT, by DLS for the damping parameter ε = 0.25 (21). All free parameters converge at 30–50 iterations except kT, where value varies between 3200 and 3350 s−1, but this variation does not affect the error, suggesting that the value of this parameter cannot be resolved for this experiment (see Table 1). The mean-square error (21) converges quickly to a normalized value, Error = e22/N <2 × 10−6 s−1, and the fit of data is excellent. The resolution matrix for this fitting procedure is listed in Table 2.