Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 13;91(7):e02033-16. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02033-16

TABLE 3.

Protein distance analysis on selected antigens between clinical isolates and V160

Clinical isolate % Similarity with indicated V160 antigena
gB gO gH gL pUL128 pUL130 pUL131
VHL/E 4.1827 23.2435 3.6864 1.9343 0.6098 1.9075 0.0002
VR1814 5.1331 15.4296 0.6727 1.9313 1.2091 2.4834 0.0486
VR3908 4.1849 20.2599 3.2649 1.9343 1.2091 2.8977 0.0074
VR7863 4.1849 22.9828 3.6831 1.5545 1.8242 1.6592 0.0071
VR5235 4.1849 20.5298 2.5922 1.5545 1.2093 2.8766 0.0069
VR5022 4.2992 22.9828 3.6831 1.5545 1.8242 0 0.0053
UXCA 4.0721 20.3977 0.5386 0.7754 1.8242 0.78 0.0045
NR 4.5172 28.365 3.4305 1.9343 1.2091 3.3916 0.7784
TB40E 4.4039 15.4163 0.535 1.5545 1.8242 1.6592 0.0038
SUB 22 4.2992 22.9828 3.6831 1.9343 1.8242 0 0
SUB 24 4.2992 22.9828 3.6831 2.3307 1.8242 0 0
Global 3.520 ± 0.007 20.255 ± 0.029 2.259 ± 0.006 1.582 ± 0.003 1.362 ± 0.003 1.340 ± 0.005 0.205 ± 0.001
a

Protein distances were estimated using the algorithm within PhyML using a PAM model of molecular evolution. The values in the table were converted from a distance by taking 1 minus the distance and multiplying it by 100 to arrive at a percent similarity. Global values are the average percentage of similarity among complete viral sequences obtained from NCBI GenBank (n = 194).