Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 3;4(1):60–78. doi: 10.1080/23328940.2016.1277003

Table 2.

An overview of the studies using per-cooling in relation with exercise performance.

Study Exercise protocol Method of Cooling Change in exercise performance Change in temperature Ambient conditions Conclusion
Ansley et al. 200846 Cycling to exhaustion at 75% of VO2 max Facial water spray cooling (a spray every 30 s) 51% improvement in time to performance No difference in Trec 29°C
50% rh
Facial water spray cooling improved exercise capacity
Barwood et al. 201542 16.1-km cycling time trial Menthol spray on cycling jersey after 10 km No difference in time trial performance No difference in Trec 33.5°C
33% rh
Menthol spray cooling did not improve time trial performance
de Carvalho et al. 201447 40-km cycling time trial Cold water ingestion (10°C, ad libitum) No difference in time trial performance No difference in Trec 35°C
60% rh
Cold water ingestion did not improve time trial performance
Cuttel et al. 2016102 Cycling to exhaustion at 60% of maximal power output Ice vest during cycling 16.7% improvement in time to exhaustion No difference in Trec 35°C Wearing an ice-vest is effective in improving exercise capacity, whereas a neck cooling collar is not effective
    Neck cooling collar during cycling No difference in time to exhaustion No difference in Trec 50% rh  
Eijsvogels et al. 201436 5-km running time trial Cooling vest during exercise No difference in time trial performance No difference in Tgi 25°C
55% rh
Wearing a cooling vest did not improve time trial performance
Hsu et al. 200549 30-km cycling time trial Hand cooling (22°C) during cycling 6.6% improvement in exercise time No difference in Ttymp 32°C
24% rh
Hand cooling improved 30-km cycling time trial performance
Luomala et al. 201237 70 min cycling trial (60% VO2 max) with intermittent-sprints (80% VO2 max) Ice vest applied after 30 min of exercise, until point of exhaustion 21.5% improvement of exercise time until exhaustion No change in Tc 30°C
40% rh
Wearing an ice-vest during exercise enhances exercise performance
Minetti et al. 201133 90 min preloaded running (75 min 60% of VO2 max and 15 min time trial) Neck collar (−80°C, left in ambient conditions for 5 min before use) 11.3% improvement of covered distance during 15 min time trial No difference in Trec 30°C
53% rh
Neck collar cooling is effective in improving exercise performance
Mündel et al. 200638 Cycling to exhaustion at 65% of peak aerobic power Cold water ingestion (3.6°C vs. 19.4°C) 11% improvement in time to exhaustion Trec ∼0.25↓ in second half of exercise protocol 33°C
28% rh
Cold fluid ingestion improved exercise capacity in the heat
Mündel and Jones 201041 Cycling to exhaustion at 65% of peak aerobic power 25 mL menthol ingestion every 10 min 8.6% improvement in time to exhaustion No difference in Trec 34°C
27% rh
Menthol ingestion improved exercise capacity
Scheadler et al. 201348 Running at 75% of VO2 max until exhaustion Hand cooling 11.6% impairment of exercise time until exhaustion No difference in Tc 30°C
50% rh
Time to exhaustion was decreased by hand cooling
Schlader et al. 201139 Cycling to exhaustion at RPE of 16 Facial wind cooling (20°C, 0.74 m/s) 17.8% improvement in time to exhaustion No difference in Trec 20°C Facial wind cooling as well as menthol gel cooling improved time to exhaustion
    Facial menthol gel cooling (0.5 g/100 cm2 of skin) 20.7% improvement in time to exhaustion No difference in Trec 48% rh  
Stevens et al. 201640 5-km running time trial Facial water spray cooling (3 sprays every 0.2 km mark) 2.4% improvement in time trial performance No difference in Trec 33°C
34% rh
Water spray cooling improved time trial performance
Stevens et al. 201643 5-km running time trial Menthol mouth rinse cooling (25 mL every 0.2 km mark) 2.8% improvement in time trial performance No difference in Trec 33°C
46% rh
Menthol mouth rinse improved time trial performance
Teunissen et al. 2013103 15-km cycling time trial performance Wind cooling (4 m/s) during kilometers 3–12 4.4% improvement in time trial performance No difference in Trec 28°C
80% rh
Wind cooling improved time trial performance
Tyler et al. 201035 Study A: 75 min running 60% of VO2 max and a 15 min self-paced time trial Neck collar (−80°C, left in ambient conditions for 5 min before use) Study A: 5.9% improvement of covered distance during time trial Study A: no difference in neck Tskin 30°C
50% rh
Cooling the neck can improve exercise performance in a hot environment.
  Study B: 15 min running time trial   Study B: no difference total covered distance Study B: Neck Tskin is lower in cooling condition 30°C
50% rh
 
Tyler and Sunderland 2011104 90 min preloaded running trial (75 min 60% of VO2 max and 15 min self-paced Neck collar (−80°C, left in ambient conditions for 10 min before use) 7.0% improvement in time trial performance Neck temperature is reduced by wearing a neck collar 30°C
53% rh
Neck cooling improved time trial performance
Tyler and Sunderland 201134 Running at 70% of VO2 until exhaustion Neck collar (−80°C, left in ambient conditions for 5 min before use) 13.5% improvement of exercise time until exhaustion Neck Tskin is reduced 32°C Cooling the neck increased the time until exhaustion
        Trec = 0.43↑ 53% rh  

Tc = core body temperature; Tskin = skin temperature; Trec = rectal temperature; Ttymp = tympanic temperature; Tgi = gastrointestinal temperature;

VO2 max = maximal oxygen consumption; rh = relative humidity; RPE = rate of perceived exertion