Table 2. Census-Level ANC-RT.
Quantity | “True” Value | ANC-RT Data Scenario | Mean Difference (or Mean Estimate) | MAE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Years of RT Data | Years of RT Data | |||||||
| ||||||||
1 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 5 | |||
Prevalence in 2011 (ρ2011) | 6.615% | No ANC-RT | −0.103% | 0.450% | ||||
|
||||||||
Census | −0.107% | −0.120% | 0.097% | 0.451% | 0.463% | 0.419% | ||
| ||||||||
Prevalence Change 2010–2011 (ρ2011–ρ2010) | −0.193% | No ANC-RT | 0.017% | 0.022% | ||||
|
||||||||
Census | 0.018% | 0.019% | 0.011% | 0.022% | 0.023% | 0.018% | ||
| ||||||||
Prevalence in 2016 (ρ2016) | 5.738% | No ANC-RT | −0.052% | 0.378% | ||||
|
||||||||
Census | −0.057% | −0.072% | 0.113% | 0.382% | 0.390% | 0.360% | ||
| ||||||||
Prevalence Change 2015–2016 (ρ2016–ρ2015) | −0.179% | No ANC-RT | 0.008% | 0.014% | ||||
|
||||||||
Census | 0.008% | 0.007% | 0.001% | 0.015% | 0.015% | 0.013% | ||
| ||||||||
Calibration btw UAT and pregnant women (αUAT) | 0.2402 | No ANC-RT | −0.0177 | 0.0427 | ||||
|
||||||||
Census | −0.0152 | −0.0121 | −0.0269 | 0.0422 | 0.0423 | 0.0436 | ||
| ||||||||
Non-Sampling Variance of UAT ( ) | 0.01301 | No ANC-RT | 0.00032 | 0.00360 | ||||
|
||||||||
Census | 0.00086 | 0.00050 | 0.00078 | 0.00417 | 0.00371 | 0.00437 | ||
| ||||||||
Calibration btw RT and pregnant women (αRT ) | NA | Census | 0.2315 | 0.2257 | 0.2148 | NA | NA | NA |
| ||||||||
Non-Sampling Variance of Census RT ( ) | NA | Census | 0.01455 | 0.00427 | 0.00153 | NA | NA | NA |