Table 4. Comparison of MSKCC and Heng's Model and their modified models.
MSKCC Model | Post-treatment Eosinophil modified MSKCC Model | ||||||||
Patients (No.) | 1-Year Survival | 2-Year Survival | Median Survival | Patients (No.) | 1-Year Survival | 2-Year Survival | Median Survival | p-value | |
Favorable | 66 | 91.40% | 77.60% | 77.9 months | 99 | 93.70% | 76.20% | 77.9 months | 0.756 |
Intermediate | 178 | 77.30% | 48.80% | 22.4 months | 140 | 70.20% | 38.60% | 19.4 months | 0.121 |
Poor | 38 | 25.10% | 0.00% | 8.9 months | 33 | 22.60% | 0.00% | 8.8 months | 0.787 |
Heng's Model | Post-treatment Eosinophil modified Heng's Model | ||||||||
Patients (No.) | 1-Year Survival | 2-Year Survival | Median Survival | Patients (No.) | 1-Year Survival | 2-Year Survival | Median Survival | p-value | |
Favorable | 55 | 86.60% | 75.70% | 77.9 months | 96 | 92.90% | 78.20% | 77.9 months | 0.712 |
Intermediate | 158 | 82.20% | 55.20% | 31.1 months | 126 | 77.50% | 44.70% | 21.9 months | 0.098 |
Poor | 69 | 41.30% | 13.70% | 10.3 months | 60 | 35.70% | 11.00% | 9.4 months | 0.707 |