Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 20;7(42):68954–68965. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12135

Table 3. Pooled and subgroup analysis of main results for the meta-analysis of overall survival (OS).

Categories Trials (Patients) HR (95% CI) I2 (%) Ph Z P
OS 15 (4238) 1.89 (1.56-2.29)R 62.9% 0.001 6.58 < 0.001
Cancer type
 CRC 3 (1050) 2.25 (1.40-3.61)R 72.5% 0.026 3.35 0.001
 NSCLC 2 (477) 1.77 (1.33-2.35) 0.0% 0.891 3.91 < 0.001
 HCC 2 (300) 2.25 (1.47-3.43) 0.0% 0.521 3.75 < 0.001
 BC 2 (977) 1.52 (1.23-1.88) 0.0% 0.804 3.83 < 0.001
 CC 2 (315) 2.00 (0.85-4.74) 18.6% 0.268 1.58 0.114
 EC 2 (188) 2.56 (1.72-3.79) 44.4% 0.180 4.67 < 0.001
 Others 2 (931) 1.22 (1.03-1.44)R 61.3% 0.108 2.29 0.022
Clinical stage
 I–IV 7 (2302) 1.65 (1.33-2.04)R 57.1% 0.030 4.53 < 0.001
 I–III 4 (693) 2.48 (1.60-3.85)R 64.1% 0.039 4.04 < 0.001
 II–III 2 (928) 1.76 (1.33-2.32) 0.0% 0.775 3.98 < 0.001
 I–II 2 (315) 2.00 (0.85-4.74) 18.6% 0.268 1.58 0.114
Study region
 Eastern Asia 10 (2336) 1.89 (1.45-2.45)R 62.0% 0.005 4.77 < 0.001
 Europe 5 (1902) 1.92 (1.43-2.60)R 65.9% 0.020 4.28 < 0.001
Blinding status *
 Yes 13 (3938) 1.86 (1.51-2.28)R 65.5% 0.001 5.93 < 0.001
 NR 2 (300) 2.25 (1.47-3.43) 0.0% 0.521 3.75 < 0.001
Sample size
 ≥ 100 11 (3884) 1.80 (1.45-2.23)R 65.9% 0.001 5.34 < 0.001
 < 100 4 (354) 2.24 (1.67-2.99) 0.0% 0.423 5.43 < 0.001
NOS score
 ≤ 6 8 (1032) 2.38 (1.94-2.93) 18.4% 0.285 8.23 < 0.001
 > 6 7 (3206) 1.43 (1.28-1.60) 46.4% 0.082 6.14 < 0.001
*

Blinding status represented that the evaluation of the tumor-troma ratio was blinded to the clinical outcomes.

OS overall survival, CRC colorectal cancer; NSCLC non small cell lung cancer; HCC hepatocellular carcinoma; BC breast cancer; CC cervival cancer; EC esophagus cancer; NOS Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.