Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 20;7(42):68954–68965. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12135

Table 4. Pooled and subgroup analysis of main results for the meta-analysis restricted to studies of disease-free survival (DFS).

Categories Trials (Patients) HR (95% CI) I2 (%) Ph Z P
DFS 9 (2235) 2.10 (1.67-2.63)R 49.1% 0.046 6.41 < 0.001
Cancer type
CC 2 (315) 2.11 (1.01-4.45) 0.0% 0.385 1.97 0.049
CRC 2 (832) 2.79 (1.32-5.89)R 86.5% 0.006 2.70 0.007
EC 2 (188) 2.10 (1.43-3.08) 64.6% 0.093 3.81 < 0.001
Others 3 (900) 1.73 (1.39-2.15) 0.0% 0.735 4.91 < 0.001
Clinical stage
I–IV 3 (590) 1.62 (1.26-2.08) 0.0% 0.840 3.74 < 0.001
I–III 3 (620) 2.79 (1.65-4.70)R 75.6% 0.017 3.85 < 0.001
II–III 1 (710) 1.95 (1.45-2.61) NA NA 4.45 < 0.001
I–II 2 (315) 2.11 (1.01-4.45) 0.0% 0.385 1.97 0.049
Study region
Easern Asia 5 (907) 1.88 (1.48-2.40) 14.3% 0.323 5.11 < 0.001
Europe 4 (1328) 2.18 (1.51-3.14)R 71.5% 0.014 4.19 < 0.001
Sample size
≥100 6 (1954) 2.13 (1.58-2.87)R 61.1% 0.025 4.95 < 0.001
<100 3 (281) 2.05 (1.48-2.85) 30.4% 0.237 4.31 < 0.001
NOS score
≤ 6 4 (441) 2.94 (2.18-3.95) 44.9% 0.142 7.12 < 0.001
> 6 5 (1794) 1.79 (1.51-2.12) 0.0% 0.703 6.69 < 0.001

DFS disease-free survival; NA not available; CC cervical cancer; CRC colorectal cancer; EC esophagus cancer; NOS Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

All pooled HRs were calculated from fixed-effect model except for cells marked with (random R). Ph denotes P value for heterogeneity based on Q test; P denotes P value for statistical significance based on Z test.