Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 1;8(2):2672–2680. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13737

Table 3. Meta-analysis of association between increased NEAT1 expression and clinicopathological parameters.

Clinicopathological parameters Studies (n) Patients (n) OR (95% CI) P-value Heterogeneity
I2(%) Ph Model
Age (≥ 55 vs. < 55 years) 7 945 0.95 (0.73–1.25) 0.74 0 0.65 Fixed
Gender (Male vs. Female) 6 796 0.96 (0.72–1.28) 0.77 40 0.14 Fixed
Smoking (Yes vs. No) 2 227 0.96 (0.54–1.71) 0.9 0 0.61 Fixed
Tumor size (≥ 5 cm vs. <5 cm) 5 677 1.74 (1.26–2.41) < 0.001 0 0.41 Fixed
Lymph node metastasis (Yes vs. No) 6 806 2.29 (1.71–3.06) < 0.001 18 0.3 Fixed
TNM stage (III–IV vs. I–II) 7 945 3.60 (2.27–5.72) < 0.001 58 0.03 Random
Tumor differentiation (Poor vs. Moderate/Well) 5 334 2.16 (1.58–2.93) < 0.001 0 0.77 Fixed
Distant metastasis (Yes vs. No) 5 755 3.51 (1.75–7.01) < 0.001 61 0.04 Random
Invasion depth (T3–T4 vs. T1–T2) 3 276 1.94 (1.36–2.75) < 0.001 0 0.49 Fixed