Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 17;37(4):503–521. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3623-z

Table 3.

Systemic lupus erythematosus organ manifestations in Canadian, American, Australian and New Zealand Indigenous Populations Compared to the Caucasian Population (where available)a

Criteria Aboriginal, Canada First Nations, Canada American Indian Alaska Native American Indian/Alaska Native Australian Aborigine New Zealand Maori
Photosensitivity 41 vs 57% [73] 75% [42]
39 vs 42% [5]
69% [17] 39% [57] 53%# [85] 14% [82]
11 vs 50%b [86]
11 vs 39%b [87]
NR
Malar rash 54 vs 64% [73] 12.5% [42]
56 vs 50% [5]
69% [17] 46% [57] 32% [85] 27% [82]
44 vs 83%b [86]
NR
Discoid rash 13 vs 20% [73] 24 vs 25% [5] 0% [17] 15% [57] 8%# [85] 9% [82]
28 vs 67%b [86]
NR
Oral ulcers 49 vs 58% [73] 38% [42]
17 vs 33% [5]
32% [17] 15% [57] 35%# [85] 14% [82]
17 vs 50%b [86]
NR
Serositis 37 vs 32% [73] 50% [42]
33 vs 27% [76]
Pericarditis
22 vs 12% [5]
Pleuritis
25 vs 26% [5]
38% [17] 62% [57] 48% [85] Pericarditis
32% [82]
22 vs 17% [86]
Pleuritis
45% [82]
50 vs 83%b [86]
NR
Arthritis 74 vs 82% [73] 90 vs 82% [5]
90 vs 67%b [77]
88% [17] 92% [57] 80%# [85] 64% [82]
78 vs 83% [86]
76 vs 90% [87]
NR
Neurologic 14 vs 6% [75] 13% [42]
13 vs 9% [76]
Seizures
10 vs 3% [5]
Psychosis
10 vs 6% [5]
32% [17] 31% [57] 3% [85] 5% [82]
6 vs 17% [86]
34 vs 48% [87]
NR
Hematologic 60 vs 70% [73] Leukopenia
70% [42]
33 vs 43% [5]
Thrombocytopenia 29 vs 15% [5]
Hemolytic anemia 13 vs 4% [5]
Lymphopenia
60 vs 65% [5]
44% [17] 54% [57] 90% [85] Leukopenia
5% [82]
44 vs 33% [86]
Thrombocytopenia 32% [82]
39 vs 17%b [86]
Hemolytic anemia 9% [82]
14 vs 0% [86]
Lymphopenia
64% [82]
77 vs 33%b [86]
Anemia
38 vs 31% [87]
NR
Renal Ever
Renal disease
39 vs 40% [73]
At diagnosis
Proteinuria
22 vs 16% [5]
Casts 17 vs 6%b [5]
Ever
Proteinuria
46 vs 25%a [5]
Casts
35 vs 12%b [5]
Nephritis
48 vs 29% [77]
57 vs 32%b [76]
Renal disease
0% [42]
At diagnosis
Nephritis
21 vs 12% [81]
Ever
Renal disease
32% [17]
Ever
Renal disease 39% [57]
Ever
40% [82]
Ever
Proteinuria
22 vs 17% [86]
62% [82]
Casts
11 vs 0% [86]
41% [82]
Renal disease
46 vs 28% [87]
At diagnosis
Nephritis 10 vs 4%b [79]
Ever
Nephritis 17 vs 19% [79]c
ANA positive 96 vs 95% [73] 88% [42]
100 vs 98% [5]
69% [17] 100% [57] 98% [82] 100% [82]
100 vs 100% [86]
NR
Immunologic criteria 89 vs 83% [73] 38% [17] 77% [57] 61%# [82] NR

#Aggregate data presented. Publication provides combined rates and separated by region (Alaska, Phoenix, Oklahoma)—only arthritis, immunologic disorder, oral ulcers and discoid rash differ significantly between groups—with arthritis and discoid rash being more frequent in Phoenix, Immunologic disorder more frequent in Alaska, photosensitivity and oral ulcers being less common in Oklahoma

aIndigenous population % versus comparison population % if available; in all studies, the comparison population was Caucasian except for Bossingham [87] where the comparison was to the non-Indigenous Population

bStatistically significant difference

cAfter adjustment significant difference between groups [OR 8.47 (95% CI 2.11–33.96) vs all patients]