Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 18.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Sep 11;84(5):e655–e661. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.07.2367

Table 1. Patient and treatment imaging parameters that influence image quality.

Patient No. of fractions acquired (of 40) Stage Prostate PTV vol (cm3) Nodal PTV vol (cm3) Jaw field size (cm × cm)* Patient lateral width (cm) Patient vertical thickness (cm) Imaging frequency (Hz)
1 26 T3B 134 507 13.9 × 18.0 35.9 21.1 10
2 23 T1C 117 356 13.9 × 16.2 38.0 22.0 10
3 29 T3A 159 246 14.0 × 14.0 34.2 19.9 5
4 25 T1C 248 0 12.0 × 10.1 41.2 26.7 10
5 24 T1C 327 0 14.0 × 12.7 33.8 19.5 5
6 30 T2A 170 0 12.8 × 10.6 36.5 21.8 10
7 25 T2B 108 590 14.0 × 16.8 37.9 22.9 10
8 30 T1C 218 0 11.1 × 10.6 36.0 21.4 10
9 28 T1C 138 0 10.3 × 10.0 34.5 23.1 5
10 28 T3A 126 333 14.0 × 16.1 33.5 20.4 5

All images were acquired with 125 kVp, 80 mA, 13 ms with the detector at 180 cm from the source.

*

Averaged over 2 treatment arcs.

As measured in the isocenter axial plane.