Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Mem Lang. 2015 Oct 31;86:119–140. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.002

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Value of the λ parameter for the best-fitting WAS with combined item and context-based semantic cuing, for each experiment. (a) In Experiment 1, most participants had values of λ of very near to 1, indicating that their recall behavior was more consistent with the item-based semantic cuing mechanism. (b) In Experiment 2, a substantial subset of participants had values of λ that were near to 0, consistent with the context-based semantic cuing mechanism. (c) Most participants in Experiment 3 had behavior that was most consistent with item-based semantic cuing.