Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 20;12(3):e0172623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172623

Table 3. Estimated impact of the intervention (PRONTO training) over the probability of routine practices at birtha.

Variables 4 month post intervention 8 month post intervention 12 month post intervention
Impactc p-value Impactc p-value Impactc p-value
Complete AMTSLb 0.203 0.044** 0.099 0.240 0.141 0.133
1st step of AMTSLb 0.211 0.070* 0.082 0.444 0.249 0.026**
Skin to skin contact (SSC) 0.164 0.067* 0.129 0.149 -0.022 0.752
Delayed cord clamping (DCC) -0.140 0.287 0.046 0.696 0.419 0.004**
Episiotomy -0.058 0.612 -0.127 0.238 -0.097 0.386
Fundal pressure (Kristeller maneuver) -0.079 0.265 0.175 0.034** 0.036 0.622
Uterine sweeping -0.296 0.001** -0.223 0.010** -0.039 0.676

a Impact estimates were obtained by fitting difference-in-differences mixed-effects logistic regression models adjusting for provider´s profession. The matched structure of the data was considered including dummy variables of the matched pair. Afterwards, we obtained marginal effects for interpretation in terms of the change in the probability of the outcome.

b Active Management of Third Stage of Labor

c Change in probability of the outcome

** p-value <0.05;

* p-value <0.10